Goal I.a
Students are able to evaluate critically, reflect, and problem-solve individually as well as collaboratively.
Artifact 1: Qualitative Research Article Review: LGBT+ Provision in School Libraries
Artifact Overview
This artifact reviews a qualitative research article by Victoria Attwell on LGBT+ provision in school libraries in the United Kingdom. The article examines how school librarians understand, support, and sometimes limit LGBT+ resources more than fifteen years after the repeal of Section 28. The study uses survey responses and thematic analysis to explore librarians’ confidence, cataloging practices, censorship concerns, perceived demand, budget constraints, neutrality, and school climate.
I selected this artifact for Outcome I.a because the review required critical evaluation of a research study’s purpose, design, strengths, and limitations. The artifact recognizes the value of thematic analysis for capturing nuance in librarians’ own words, while also identifying limitations related to self-reported data, optional responses, and the absence of student perspectives. This project reflects my ability to evaluate research thoughtfully and connect it to real professional concerns, especially inclusive collections, service to marginalized students, and the gap between stated professional values and actual library practice.
Artifact 2: LIS 6511 Course Reflection
Artifact Overview
This course reflection asked me to evaluate my learning across LIS 6511 and consider how the course connected to my work as a first-year school media specialist. In the reflection, I discussed how directly the assignments connected to responsibilities I already have in a school library, including collection analysis, collection development, nonfiction purchasing priorities, copyright support, and practical decision-making. I also reflected on the community needs assessment as the most meaningful assignment because it felt collaborative, relevant, and potentially useful beyond the course itself.
I selected this artifact for Outcome I.a because it demonstrates my ability to evaluate my own learning, reflect critically, and connect coursework to professional problem-solving. The reflection shows how I considered what was useful, what was less engaging, and how the course strengthened my confidence in areas directly connected to media center work. It also connects individual reflection to collaborative work, especially through the community needs assessment and collection development planning. This artifact is useful because it shows not only what I completed in the course, but how I understood the work as part of my growth into the media specialist role.